Loading
Not a registered political party. Registration under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 has not been applied for or granted Read the full legal position.
Loading
Every party says it welcomes scrutiny. This is a permanent feature with a public counter attached: how many times an argument from outside actually changed what we think. If that number stays at zero, this page is decoration and you should say so.
Be specific. Name the claim you think is wrong and say why.
The Assembly Constituency boundaries you are using are out of date for at least one State. You are mapping people to constituencies that no longer exist.
Our response
Correct, and this was found by our own data quality checks before launch. The dataset has no Telangana coverage because it predates the 2014 reorganisation. Rather than fall back to the old combined constituencies, the system now reports Assembly as data-unavailable for affected States and says why. The dataset is marked PENDING VERIFICATION and is not treated as authoritative.
Responded 22 Aug 2026
Refusing to record caste means you cannot detect caste discrimination inside your own organisation. That is a choice that protects you, not the people affected.
Our response
We accept this is a real cost, and we have changed how we describe it. We previously presented not collecting caste data as costless. It is not. We now state the trade-off explicitly in the FAQ and in Section 6, and we are researching whether an opt-in, aggregate-only mechanism could detect discrimination without building a caste database. No conclusion yet.
Responded 18 Aug 2026
Your commitment to publish every transaction within 7 days is unrealistic for a volunteer-run finance team and you will quietly drop it.
Our response
A fair challenge. Our answer is that the commitment stays published with its actual status, so if we miss it that will be visible rather than quiet. The Commitments page currently shows this one as IN PROGRESS, not COMPLETED.
Responded 14 Aug 2026
What a good challenge looks like
The most useful challenges we have had were specific: they named a claim, said why it did not hold, and offered something checkable. “Your AC boundary data is out of date for Telangana” was worth more than a hundred general complaints, and it changed what the software does.
A challenge does not have to be polite to be published. It does have to be about a position, not a person.